April 6, 2018 at 1:53 p.m.
EDITORIAL
Life on the line
Ever since 1973, when the Supreme Court legalized abortion for any (or no) reason through all nine months of pregnancy, pro-life activists have been warning what would happen unless that ruling were reversed: The Roe v. Wade decision would create an atmosphere in which human life would be more and more cheapened. They predicted that this anti-life atmosphere, begun in the womb, would eventually encompass infanticide and euthanasia.
Last week, the House of Representatives passed the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (see page 9). This bill was necessitated by the Supreme Court's latest assault on life, its June 28 Stenberg vs. Carhart ruling, which gave the go-ahead to partial-birth abortion. In that procedure, a child is pulled, feet-first, from the womb. Before she is completely delivered, her skull is punctured and her brains removed. The child's lifeless body is then fully delivered.
Some congressional representatives began to wonder, in the wake of that horrendous decision, what other horrors the Court would tolerate. If a child survives abortion (which has happened), would the Court permit the baby to be killed in the delivery room to complete the abortion? What if a mother decided, an hour or a day after giving birth, that she didn't want the child after all? Might enough justices being found to okay her decision to smother the baby? Why wouldn't such a "retroactive abortion" be endorsed? Might not the Court rule that if a woman wants her unborn baby dead, she has a right to her born baby being dead, too?
What once were ridiculed as ridiculous questions posed by extremists trying to make a point became a serious discussion that led to the bill passed last week to ensure protection for babies once they are born. Two signs that the law is needed are that 15 congresspeople (including three from New York State) voted against it and that the Senate will probably not bother to vote on the bill before adjourning.
This week, as Respect Life Month begins, The Evangelist starts a series of articles and columns informing Catholics about the upcoming presidential elections (see page 1 and pages 13-16). We hope the material proves useful not only on that level but also as a reference for voters to use in assessing races for the U.S. Senate, House of Representatives and State Legislature.
Wise Catholics determine their vote on a number of respect life issues, including capital punishment, war and peace, justice for the poor, and euthanasia. For starters, they should examine candidates' position papers, websites and town hall meetings to find out where they stand on the right to life of human beings -- not only within the womb but also beyond.
(10-05-00)
MORE NEWS STORIES
- As pilgrims flock to Ugandan shrine, authorities narrowly prevent massive terror attack
- Trump administration revokes Biden-era abortion directive for emergency rooms
- Illinois legislative session ends without vote on assisted suicide, but bill expected to return
- On way to California, National Eucharistic Pilgrimage is target of anti-Catholic protesters
- Colorado faith leaders express sorrow over attack on rally for release of Hamas hostages
- Indiana Catholic shares story of his life-changing bond with friend who is now Pope Leo
- Pope’s prayer intention for June: That the world grow in compassion
- Video of dancing, beatboxing nuns goes viral, boosts interest in their ministry
- Pope, Romanian bishops, Jewish officials pay tribute to martyred bishop
- As first US-born pontiff, Pope Leo may be ‘more attuned’ to polarization issue, analysts say
Comments:
You must login to comment.