April 6, 2018 at 1:53 p.m.

Courts, AA and God discussed by panelists


By KATE BLAIN- | Comments: 0 | Leave a comment

Separation of church and state wasn't important just to the writers of the Constitution: A recent discussion at Sage College of Albany debated whether it's acceptable for courts today to mandate drug offenders to attend 12-step programs, which mention God in their literature.

The conference was sponsored by The Faith and Society Project, a center at The Sage Colleges dedicated to looking at the role of beliefs in public and private life. Christopher Ringwald, a Catholic and director of the center, moderated the discussion, which featured several speakers:

* Robert Isseks, a Middletown attorney who has successfully argued that mandating 12-step program participation is unconstitutional;

* Barbara Gaige of Albany's Next Step Inc. Recovery Home for Women; and

* Judge Stephen Herrick of Albany, a former drug court administrator.

In court

Mr. Ringwald told The Evangelist that a string of court cases has ruled it unconstitutional for judges to sentence offenders to 12-step programs, such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), on the basis that the programs are religious in nature.

"It's a compelling and important issue," said the director, who has written a book titled "The Soul of Recovery: Uncovering the Spiritual Dimension in the Treatment of Addictions."

At the conference, he said, Mr. Isseks focused on the idea that outsiders looking at AA literature would see its references to God, prayer, making a moral inventory of oneself and confessing that inventory to God (see sidebar) as religious elements.

In conflict?

While Mr. Ringwald noted that there is a difference between AA and alcoholism treatment in general, he said that most alcoholism-treatment programs use the 12 steps of AA to some extent as a basis for their work. Therefore, mandating participation in such programs may violate the Constitution's ban on the establishment of religion.

Mr. Isseks' remarks at the conference also "deepened my appreciation for the danger" to groups like AA when the state sends people to join them, said Mr. Ringwald.

"It's the same issue as [President] Bush's faith-based initiatives," he stated: When religious organizations begin accepting money from the government, it becomes difficult for them to refuse government involvement in how they're run, as well.

Opposing view

On the opposite side of the debate, members of 12-step groups, like conference speaker Ms. Gaige, say that their programs aren't religious at all, but spiritual in nature.

"From the beginning, AA has defined itself as non-religious," Mr. Ringwald explained. He said that AA founders -- Bill W. and Dr. Bob S. -- had had negative experiences with religion.

The founders and their successors chose to call AA a spiritual group rather than a religious one, and say the distinction is important. Mr. Ringwald noted that when God is mentioned in 12-step programs, it is as a "personally defined deity," not that of any particular religion.

He said that conference participants from 12-step programs argued that the programs would not have worked for them if God had been specifically defined.

Judge's view

Since 12-step-based treatment programs are often the only ones available for offenders today, Judge Herrick noted at the conference that alternatives must be explored and offered.

Mr. Ringwald concluded: "To mandate someone to [a 12-step program] directly amounts to an establishment of religion."

(The Faith and Society Project is planning a conference in the fall on faith-based social services, examining the question, "Is it the faith or the service that makes the difference?" For information, call 292-1727. Mr. Ringwald's book, "The Soul of Recovery," is available at www.amazon.com.)

(04-18-02) [[In-content Ad]]


Comments:

You must login to comment.