April 6, 2018 at 1:53 p.m.
The appeal of the position supporting physician-assisted suicide is obvious. Who would not want to show what would be considered mercy and compassion to those in need of relief of their suffering?
The reality, however, is much more complex and cannot and should not be reduced to such a simple argument.
It is well established that the vast majority of individuals who lose the will to live are suffering from a treatable illness - that of clinical depression -- which, while not caused by their often horrific circumstances, has increased their pain. With treatment, most of those individuals are freed from much of their suffering and can live out their lives in comfort.
To assume that the majority of individuals who request assisted suicide are of sound mind by definition ignores the reality of the role depression and pain play in their anguish and, yes, their decisions.
In addition, I know of none of my colleagues who have been asked whether they would like to have foisted upon them a new and distinct role: that of suicide assistant, as opposed to caregiver, healer and alleviator of pain.
It would be foolish for a public which already distrusts the healthcare system to give this new and quite frankly awesome responsibility to physicians, most of whom may not want it. Would it also not potentially change, at least in the minds of some, the way their physician is viewed?
This, in and of itself, is worthy of lengthy discussion and debate.
The desire to alleviate suffering is laudable, but it must also be asked: Just who is suffering? Is it not also the spouse of the patient with Alzheimer's disease -- often, moreso than the patient themselves? Ask your physicians how often they have been asked to alleviate suffering, and ask them as well if they have ever questioned just whose suffering they are being asked to alleviate.
Physicians and other healthcare providers need to continue to be trained to identify the myriad forms which depression takes, and to be better able to treat it and manage pain, as well. Rare is the young doctor who chooses to go into geriatrics or palliative care; there are just too many disincentives at present, and these specialties are grossly underserved.
As a society, we need to better address these compelling public health issues intellectually, and not simply through an appeal to emotions alone. [[In-content Ad]]
SOCIAL MEDIA
OSV NEWS
- Pope Leo XIV names Archbishop Caccia papal ambassador to United States
- Trump administration seeks pause on another lawsuit challenging abortion pill
- Pew: Americans ‘more likely’ to disapprove of their own nation’s morals
- Indiana court blocks state abortion restrictions in lawsuit claiming religious objections
- Diocese of El Paso declares bankruptcy to settle abuse claims filed under New Mexico lookback law
- Washington Roundup: Iran war powers resolution fails; Noem fired; human trafficking bill advances
- Chaldean Catholic bishop in California jailed for alleged financial crimes
- Can AI be a tool for virtue? Catholics grapple with Anthropic’s claim of virtuous AI
- With wars and disasters overseas, bishops’ annual CRS Collection ‘more vital than ever’
- ‘Underbelly of the AI industry’: Panel explores data centers’ ecological, economic impacts

Comments:
You must login to comment.